• Sonia Rola

Overspending wife fails to have divorce payments increased


Overspending wife fails to have divorce payments increased

A wife who lost most of her divorce settlement because of unsuccessful investments has failed in her legal battle to make her former husband pay her more to compensate for her losses.


Graham and Maria Mills had married in 1987 and divorced in 2002. They had one child.


The matrimonial home was sold, and the proceeds were used to award £230,000 to Mrs Mills in settlement of all her capital claims against her husband.


Mr Mills was also ordered to make periodical payments at an annual rate of £13,200.


When the consent order was made, he conceded that Mrs Mills had no capacity to raise a mortgage but suggested that she could buy a suitable home for her son and herself for £230,000 or less without a mortgage.


Instead, she obtained part-time employment and bought a house for £345,000 by using the capital sum and raising the balance with a mortgage.


Mrs Mills then entered into a number of property investments, which turned out to be unsuccessful. By 2015, she had no capital, significant liabilities and was living in rented accommodation.


She applied to the court for an increase in the monthly payments made to her by Mr Mills.


The judge found that there was a shortfall of £4,092 between her annual need and what Mr Mills was paying but he refused to order an increase.


The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which has upheld the judge’s decision. It held that the original divorce settlement in 2002 would have enabled Mrs Mills to buy a home free of a mortgage but she had not managed her finances wisely.


She was in her current position because of the choices she had made. She would have to adjust her expenditure to live within her means and that it was fair that the husband's contribution should not be increased to compensate for her unwise investments.


The judge at the original hearing was entitled to decline her application for Mr Mills to increase his payments to her, even if he could afford to do so.

Please contact our expert legal team on 0208 004 0065, by email at hello@southgate.co.uk or using the form below if you would like more information or advice about the issues raised in this article, or any aspect of family law.


Case Citations: [2018] UKSC 38, MILLS v MILLS (2018) SC (Lady Hale PSC, Lord Wilson JSC, Lord Carnwath JSC, Lord Hughes JSC, Lord Hodge JSC)

What We Offer You

Expert

Solicitors

Price

Promise

Expert Solicitors, Legal Experts, Solicitor, Family Law Expert, Family Law Solicitors, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Experts, Divorce Solicitors
Price Promise, Low Fees, Low Costs, Fixed-Fees, Best Prices

Skype

Meetings

24/7

Enquiry Line

​24/7 Enquiry Line
Skype Meetings, Telephone Conferences, Facetime Meetings, Webcam, Remote Meetings, Flexible

Out of Hours

Appointments

Quick

Responses

Quick Responses, Same Day Call, Quick Chat, Urgent Service
Out of Hours Appointments, Evening Meetings, Weekend Meetings, Evening Appointments, Weekend Appointments, Saturday Appointments

No Hidden

Fees

Modern

Service

No Hidden Fees, Low Costs, Best Prices, Low Cost Divorce, Fixed-Fees, Best Prices, Reasoanble Legal Fees
Modern Service, Technology, Secure Electronic Access, Electronic Files, Paperless

Expedited

Services

Law Society

Accreditation

Law Society Accreditation, Family Law Advanced Panel, Family Law Advanced Accreditation, Law Society Panel
Expedited Services, Urgent Service, Quick Service, Urgent Matters, Emergency Cases
Do you need to discuss your family law matter with a solicitor?
Call us now or send an enquiry below to discuss your options!