A wife has failed in her attempt to force the immediate sale of her former husband's company shares as the High Court ruled it was “was not a propitious time to sell”.
The wife had applied for financial remedy orders after the seven-year marriage broke down.
She was from a wealthy family and the couple had two homes that had been bought with the help of her father.
The wife had various shareholdings in companies operated by her father and was the beneficiary of several family trusts.
The husband owned 50% of his trading company and earned £619,000 net per year. There was a dispute over how much the business was worth, with various reports valuing it between £48.9m and £77.3m.
The wife submitted that the husband’s business should be sold so the proceeds could be split 50-50.
The husband wanted to wait until he had realised his interests in the company over a five-year period to maximise its value.
The court heard that the business had just recorded its two worst years.
It didn’t order an immediate sale as it was not a propitious time to sell and the husband would have to bear a substantial discount on the value of his shares.
Instead, he was ordered to pay a lump sum of £8.9m as well as periodical payments of £50,000 per annum.
If you would like more information or advice about the issues raised in this article, or any aspect of family law please contact our expert legal team on 0208 004 0065, by email at firstname.lastname@example.org or using the form below.
Case Citations:  EWHC 1338 (Fam) FW v FH (2019) Fam Div (Cohen J)
The contents of this article is general information only. The information in this article is not legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this article was published. Readers should not act on the basis of the information included and should obtain independent expert advice from qualified solicitors such as those within our firm.