• Rajan Thandi

Court settles parental dispute over taking children abroad

The Court of Appeal has settled a dispute between two estranged parents who each wanted to take their children abroad but objected to the other having the same right.

The mother was a national of Qatar and the father was a national of the United Arab Emirates. The children lived in England with the mother. Each parent sought the court's permission to take the children for temporary visits to Qatar and Dubai, respectively.

Each objected to the other having permission, claiming there was a risk that the children would not be returned to England.

Neither the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 nor the Hague Convention on Parental Responsibility and Child Protection 1996 applied, and there was no cross-border legal framework under which the issue could be regulated.

The judge heard evidence from an expert on Middle East law. The expert indicated that an English court order dealing with such matters would be neither recognised nor enforced in a court in the UAE or Qatar.

He was asked questions concerning the likely effectiveness of an order from the UAE and Qatar courts in which both parents committed to return the children to England under agreed terms.

The expert indicated that he had not heard of a case in which the local court had refused to accept an agreement, or where an agreed order had later been challenged.

Although he was clear that he was not saying that such an order would be effective, he also said that in normal circumstances the court would be expected to enforce it once it had accepted the agreement and turned it into a local court order.

On that basis, the court gave permission for the children to travel to the relevant states on condition that before the children were permitted to travel, written agreements had to be lodged and made into orders of the UAE court and the Qatar court.

The mother submitted that the judge had failed to properly address the magnitude of the risk that the children would not be returned.

The Court of Appeal rejected that argument and upheld the judge’s decision.

If you would like more information or advice about the issues raised in this article, or any aspect of family law please contact our expert legal team on 02080040065, by email at hello@southgate.co.uk or using the form below.

Case Citations: Document No.: AC5010536, [2020] EWCA Civ 277RE M (CHILDREN) (2020), CA (Civ Div) (Lewison LJ, Moylan LJ)

The contents of this article is general information only. The information in this article is not legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this article was published. Readers should not act on the basis of the information included and should obtain independent expert advice from qualified solicitors such as those within our firm.

What We Offer You








Enquiry Line

Out of Hours




No Hidden






Law Society


Do you need to discuss your family law matter with a solicitor?
Call us now or send an enquiry below to discuss your options!

Third Floor, Crown House, 47 Chase Side, London, N14 5BP

Tel: 0208 004 0065 - Email: hello@southgate.co.uk

southgate solicitors is a trading name of Southgate Solicitors Limited Company No: 10575376 - Registered Office at above address

We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No: 636415

All prices displayed are inclusive of VAT.

VAT No: 263804305

Privacy Terms of Use - Complaints Process

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon