• Rajan Thandi

Appeal Court rules that child be returned to father in France

The Court of Appeal has ruled that a child should be returned to her father in France rather than remain with her mother in England. It said that even though she had only lived in the country for a few weeks, it had become her habitual place of residence.

The case involved a family that had been living for several years in Australia, where the child was born.

On 2 December 2019 they moved to live in France.

On 20 December the family travelled to England to stay with the mother's family over the Christmas holidays. The father returned to France on 27 December to commence his new job.

On 3 January 2020, the mother told the father that she and their daughter would not be returning to France.

The father's application for the daughter’s return under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 was dismissed because the judge determined that she was habitually resident in Australia, not France, at the date of the mother's retention of her in England.

The father submitted that the daughter was habitually resident in France and there had been wrongful retention by the mother.

The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the father. It held that the daughter had a degree of integration in France. The whole family had moved there with the intention of living there. They had a rented home there and had brought all their possessions with them, including their dog.

The father had employment and was returning to an environment with which he was very familiar.

The judge had erred by focusing only on the mother's situation, whereas the circumstances of both parents were relevant. The family's continuing connections with Australia could only be described as tenuous and the judge had failed to carry out a sufficient comparative or balancing exercise of the factors connecting the daughter with France and with Australia.

She was habitually resident in France as at 3 January 2020.

If you would like more information or advice about the issues raised in this article, or any aspect of family law please contact our expert legal team on 02080040065, by email at hello@southgate.co.uk or using the form below.

Case Citations: [2020] EWCA Civ 1187, B (A CHILD) (ABDUCTION: HABITUAL RESIDENCE) (2020),

CA (Civ Div) (Moylan LJ, Baker LJ, Phillips LJ)

The contents of this article are general information only. The information in this article is not legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this article was published. Readers should not act on the basis of the information included and should obtain independent expert advice from qualified solicitors such as those within our firm.

What We Offer You








Enquiry Line

Out of Hours




No Hidden






Law Society


Do you need to discuss your family law matter with a solicitor?
Call us now or send an enquiry below to discuss your options!

Third Floor, Crown House, 47 Chase Side, London, N14 5BP

Tel: 0208 004 0065 - Email: hello@southgate.co.uk

southgate solicitors is a trading name of Southgate Solicitors Limited Company No: 10575376 - Registered Office at above address

We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No: 636415

All prices displayed are inclusive of VAT.

VAT No: 263804305

Privacy Terms of Use - Complaints Process

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon