• Rajan Thandi

Boy’s wishes not enough to prevent him being returned to father


Boy’s wishes not enough to prevent him being returned to father

The wishes of a 12-year-old boy were not enough to prevent him from being returned to his father, especially as it was likely that he had been unduly influenced by his mother.


That was the decision of the Court of Appeal in a case involving a boy who was born in England and had lived in Italy with his English mother and Italian father.


In 2019, the mother decided she would remain in England with him. The father applied for the boy's return under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Abduction 1980. The mother contended that the father did not have rights of custody, so the Convention did not apply.


She further stated that the boy would be at grave risk of harm and placed in an intolerable situation if he were forced to return to his father.


The boy was interviewed by a Family Court adviser and did not wish to give a preference as to where he lived. He expressed his unease at being involved in the decision making as he did not feel strongly about either option.


The judge found that the father had rights of custody and his application for summary return was granted. The mother successfully appealed the order on the basis that there had been a fundamental change of circumstances as the boy had since stated that he wished to remain in the UK.


The father submitted that the mother had influenced the boy between the hearings.


The Court of Appeal found in favour of the father. It held that the evidence did not cross the high threshold of a fundamental change of circumstances for setting aside a return order.


The Hague Convention created a summary jurisdiction intended to ensure that applications were determined expeditiously.


The boy's views were not determinative but were part of the exercise of the court's discretion bearing in mind the extent to which they were authentically his own and not merely reflective of the influence of the abducting parent.


Even taken at their highest, the boy's views could not be construed as expressing an enthusiastic or unambiguous wish to stay in the UK and it was not a case where his long-held views had been misunderstood.


His views should have been assessed in the context of the considerable emotional pressure he was under since the return order had been made. The preponderance of evidence pointed to exercising the court's discretion in favour of return.


If you would like more information or advice about the issues raised in this article, or any aspect of family law please contact our expert legal team on 02080040065, by email at hello@southgate.co.uk or using the form below.


Case Citations: [2021] EWCA Civ 194 / RE A (A BOY) (1980 HAGUE CONVENTION: SET ASIDE) (2021) CA (Civ Div) (Moylan LJ, Asplin LJ, Hayden J)


The contents of this article are general information only. The information in this article is not legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this article was published. Readers should not act on the basis of the information included and should obtain independent expert advice from qualified solicitors such as those within our firm.

What We Offer You

Expert

Solicitors

Price

Promise

Expert Solicitors, Legal Experts, Solicitor, Family Law Expert, Family Law Solicitors, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Experts, Divorce Solicitors
Price Promise, Low Fees, Low Costs, Fixed-Fees, Best Prices

Skype

Meetings

24/7

Enquiry Line

​24/7 Enquiry Line
Skype Meetings, Telephone Conferences, Facetime Meetings, Webcam, Remote Meetings, Flexible

Out of Hours

Appointments

Quick

Responses

Quick Responses, Same Day Call, Quick Chat, Urgent Service
Out of Hours Appointments, Evening Meetings, Weekend Meetings, Evening Appointments, Weekend Appointments, Saturday Appointments

No Hidden

Fees

Modern

Service

No Hidden Fees, Low Costs, Best Prices, Low Cost Divorce, Fixed-Fees, Best Prices, Reasoanble Legal Fees
Modern Service, Technology, Secure Electronic Access, Electronic Files, Paperless

Expedited

Services

Law Society

Accreditation

Law Society Accreditation, Family Law Advanced Panel, Family Law Advanced Accreditation, Law Society Panel
Expedited Services, Urgent Service, Quick Service, Urgent Matters, Emergency Cases
Do you need to discuss your family law matter with a solicitor?
Call us now or send an enquiry below to discuss your options!